When G-Dragon took the stage at the 2025 MAMA Awards on November 29 at Hong Kong’s Kai Tak Stadium, the expectation was sky-high. He performed a mix of hits, including “DRAMA,” “Heartbreaker,” and “Untitled, 2014.” By night’s end, he walked away with major awards, including Artist of the Year.
But for many watching on livestreams and broadcasts, the performance failed to deliver the live energy fans expected. Listeners complained about weak vocals, heavy reliance on backing tracks (AR), and minimal choreography or movement compared with prior live shows.
The backlash was swift. On social media and music-fan forums, many expressed shock. Some called the show a “disaster” and questioned whether it was “really live.” Others felt disappointed, arguing that the vocal flaws overshadowed the award’s honor.
Things became more complicated when G-Dragon himself weighed in. Under a highlight video of his MAMA performance posted by the official account, he left nothing but a thumbs-down emoji and an ellipsis. That tiny gesture sent waves. Many interpreted it as his own critique.
G-Dragon’s Agency Responds to the Backlash
In the wake of backlash, G-Dragon’s agency, Galaxy Corporation, offered some explanation. According to their statement, the original stage plan was changed at the last minute. A recent tragic fire influenced the decision in Hong Kong. The agency said G-Dragon chose to turn his performance into a more subdued tribute rather than a high-energy spectacle.
They mentioned that the setlist was altered and that he deliberately chose songs like “Untitled, 2014” to express empathy and solidarity with victims. He also reportedly donated 1 million Hong Kong dollars to aid recovery efforts.
Why the Reaction Is Mixed
Despite the explanation, many remain unconvinced. Critics argue that regardless of intent, live performance should meet a baseline standard. When vocals are weak and choreography is lacking, the show’s quality suffers. Some feel that using the Hong Kong tragedy as a justification feels like a cop-out.
On the other hand, supporters say the message was clear: this was a moment of respect, not entertainment. For fans who understand the context, the subdued tone and simplified staging made sense. They point out that his donation and public gesture of solidarity reflect genuine care, making the performance more meaningful than any flashy production.
The thumbs-down emoji G-Dragon left also complicates perceptions. It might be a personal admission that he felt the performance did not meet his own standards. Or it could be a sign of remorse over the tragedy and a subtle nod to the emotional weight he hoped to project. Either way, many interpret it as a deeper sign of vulnerability.
What This Means for G-Dragon
G-Dragon has long been celebrated not just for his music but for his artistry, charisma, and influence. His past performances have been praised for live energy and bold presentation.
This latest controversy raises difficult questions about how artists manage expectations after big returns or comebacks. It also shows how sensitive performances can become when external events overlay them. For G-Dragon, this night may become a bittersweet chapter: a four-time MAMA winner still facing scrutiny for his live form.
Final Thoughts
G-Dragon’s 2025 MAMA performance sparked more than just criticism. It opened a larger conversation about what live performances mean, especially in moments when the world around us feels fragile. The tension between artistic intent and execution is real. The facts are clear. The opinions will stay divided. But perhaps that’s the point. Art is never just one thing.
Stay tuned on Saranghero for more of the latest K-pop and K-drama news.